claude-opus-4-8

Command running in background with ID: b0ogjdj3u. Output is being written to: /tmp/claude-0/-workspace/240dc804-649a-4864-9444-d80cb400193e/tasks/b0ogjdj3u.output. You will be notified when it completes. To check interim output, use Read on that file path.
Session cwd remains /workspace; directory changes made by the backgrounded command do not apply to subsequent commands.

[metadata] {"noOutputExpected": false, "backgroundTaskId": "b0ogjdj3u", "backgroundCwdHint": "Session cwd remains /workspace; directory changes made by the backgrounded command do not apply to subsequent commands."}

frac 0.7 thr 0.571 n 124215
frac 0.85 thr -2.034 n 150833
=== frac0.70 ===
HELDOUT_PPL 403.633  loss 6.0005  train_s 56  /tmp/dev_train.npy
=== frac0.85 ===
HELDOUT_PPL 443.215  loss 6.0941  train_s 56  /tmp/dev_train.npy
---time---
3877

[stdout]
frac 0.7 thr 0.571 n 124215
frac 0.85 thr -2.034 n 150833
=== frac0.70 ===
HELDOUT_PPL 403.633  loss 6.0005  train_s 56  /tmp/dev_train.npy
=== frac0.85 ===
HELDOUT_PPL 443.215  loss 6.0941  train_s 56  /tmp/dev_train.npy
---time---
3877
[metadata] {"noOutputExpected": false}

Command running in background with ID: bqs2584cp. Output is being written to: /tmp/claude-0/-workspace/240dc804-649a-4864-9444-d80cb400193e/tasks/bqs2584cp.output. You will be notified when it completes. To check interim output, use Read on that file path.
Session cwd remains /workspace; directory changes made by the backgrounded command do not apply to subsequent commands.

[metadata] {"noOutputExpected": false, "backgroundTaskId": "bqs2584cp", "backgroundCwdHint": "Session cwd remains /workspace; directory changes made by the backgrounded command do not apply to subsequent commands."}

frac 0.65 thr 0.766 n 115343
frac 0.75 thr -0.223 n 133088
=== frac0.65 ===
HELDOUT_PPL 444.610  loss 6.0972  train_s 56  /tmp/dev_train.npy
=== frac0.75 ===
HELDOUT_PPL 444.958  loss 6.0980  train_s 56  /tmp/dev_train.npy

[stdout]
frac 0.65 thr 0.766 n 115343
frac 0.75 thr -0.223 n 133088
=== frac0.65 ===
HELDOUT_PPL 444.610  loss 6.0972  train_s 56  /tmp/dev_train.npy
=== frac0.75 ===
HELDOUT_PPL 444.958  loss 6.0980  train_s 56  /tmp/dev_train.npy
[metadata] {"noOutputExpected": false}

Command running in background with ID: b5qrcvrdw. Output is being written to: /tmp/claude-0/-workspace/240dc804-649a-4864-9444-d80cb400193e/tasks/b5qrcvrdw.output. You will be notified when it completes. To check interim output, use Read on that file path.
Session cwd remains /workspace; directory changes made by the backgrounded command do not apply to subsequent commands.

[metadata] {"noOutputExpected": false, "backgroundTaskId": "b5qrcvrdw", "backgroundCwdHint": "Session cwd remains /workspace; directory changes made by the backgrounded command do not apply to subsequent commands."}

frac 0.7 seed 456 n 124215
frac 0.7 seed 789 n 124215
=== 0.70 seed456 ===
HELDOUT_PPL 441.129  loss 6.0893  train_s 56  /tmp/dev_train.npy
=== 0.70 seed789 ===
HELDOUT_PPL 420.672  loss 6.0419  train_s 56  /tmp/dev_train.npy
---
3356

[stdout]
frac 0.7 seed 456 n 124215
frac 0.7 seed 789 n 124215
=== 0.70 seed456 ===
HELDOUT_PPL 441.129  loss 6.0893  train_s 56  /tmp/dev_train.npy
=== 0.70 seed789 ===
HELDOUT_PPL 420.672  loss 6.0419  train_s 56  /tmp/dev_train.npy
---
3356
[metadata] {"noOutputExpected": false}

The file /workspace/submission/curate.py has been updated successfully. (file state is current in your context — no need to Read it back)

[metadata] {"filePath": "/workspace/submission/curate.py", "oldString": "KEEP_FRAC = 0.55                      # drop the worst ~45% by quality", "newString": "KEEP_FRAC = 0.70                      # drop the worst ~30% by quality (tuned)", "originalFile": "\"\"\"Curate the raw web pool for pretraining a small LM whose target is a BROAD,\nhigh-quality multi-domain English distribution (Wikipedia / high-quality web prose /\nnews / technical Q&A).\n\nCriterion (DSIR-style domain importance selection):\n  Build a unigram *importance weight* w(word) = log p_target(word) - log p_pool(word),\n  where p_target is the word distribution of the disclosed HQ target domain (estimated\n  from the tokenised dev target, decoded to text) and p_pool is the word distribution of\n  the raw pool (the background). Each pool document is scored by its mean per-word\n  importance weight (how much more target-like than a random pool doc it is), with a\n  light length gate to reject junk/boilerplate fragments. Documents are emitted in\n  descending score order (best first); the trainer consumes them until the token budget.\n\nThis is a stated, reproducible criterion — not a hand-picked id list.\n\"\"\"\nimport json, re, math, numpy as np\nfrom collections import Counter\nfrom transformers import AutoTokenizer\n\nPOOL = \"/workspace/data/pool.jsonl\"\nDEV  = \"/workspace/data/multi_dev.npy\"\nOUT  = \"/workspace/submission/selection.json\"\n\nWORD = re.compile(r\"[a-z]+(?:'[a-z]+)?\")\n\ndef words(s):\n    return WORD.findall(s.lower())\n\ndef clean_target(s):\n    # wikitext artifacts in the tokenised dev sample\n    s = s.replace(\"@-@\", \"-\").replace(\"@,@\", \"\").replace(\"@.@\", \".\")\n    s = s.replace(\"<|endoftext|>\", \" \")\n    return s\n\nprint(\"loading pool...\")\nids, texts = [], []\nfor line in open(POOL):\n    r = json.loads(line)\n    ids.append(r[\"id\"]); texts.append(r[\"text\"])\nN = len(ids)\nprint(f\"{N} docs\")\n\n# --- target word distribution (disclosed HQ domain) ---\nprint(\"decoding dev target...\")\ntok = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained(\"gpt2\")\ndev = np.load(DEV)\ntgt_text = clean_target(tok.decode(dev.tolist()))\ntgt_counts = Counter(words(tgt_text))\n\n# --- background (raw pool) word distribution, from a sample ---\nprint(\"building background distribution...\")\nrng = np.random.default_rng(0)\nsample_idx = rng.choice(N, size=min(30000, N), replace=False)\nbg_counts = Counter()\nfor j in sample_idx:\n    bg_counts.update(words(texts[j]))\n\n# vocabulary: words seen enough in the background to be reliable\nV_MIN_BG = 5\nvocab = {w for w, c in bg_counts.items() if c >= V_MIN_BG}\nvocab |= {w for w, c in tgt_counts.items() if c >= 2}\nvocab = list(vocab)\nprint(f\"vocab {len(vocab)}\")\n\nTt = sum(tgt_counts.values()); Tb = sum(bg_counts.values()); Vn = len(vocab)\nalpha = 1.0\nweight = {}\nfor w in vocab:\n    pt = (tgt_counts.get(w, 0) + alpha) / (Tt + alpha * Vn)\n    pb = (bg_counts.get(w, 0) + alpha) / (Tb + alpha * Vn)\n    weight[w] = math.log(pt) - math.log(pb)\n\n# function words: dense in real prose, sparse in navigation menus / keyword lists.\nSTOP = set(\"the of and to in a is that it for as was with on be by are this at from \"\n           \"or an but not have has had he she they we you i his her their its which who \"\n           \"will would can could been were do does did so if than then them these those \"\n           \"there here what when where how all any some more most other into over\".split())\n\n# --- score every document ---\nprint(\"scoring documents...\")\nMIN_WORDS = 50      # length gate: reject fragments / boilerplate\nscores = np.full(N, -1e9, dtype=np.float64)\ng = weight.get\nfor k in range(N):\n    t = texts[k]\n    ws = words(t)\n    n = len(ws)\n    if n < MIN_WORDS:\n        continue\n    s = 0.0; nstop = 0\n    for w in ws:\n        v = g(w)\n        if v is not None:\n            s += v\n        if w in STOP:\n            nstop += 1\n    imp = s / n                       # DSIR importance: target-likeness\n    stopfrac = nstop / n              # prose vs. menu/keyword-list signal\n    # boilerplate proxies: short \"lines\" (menu items) and low prose density\n    nlines = t.count(\"\\n\") + 1\n    avg_line_words = n / nlines\n    # prose quality multiplier: reward function-word density & real sentences,\n    # penalise line-fragmented navigation dumps.\n    prose = 0.0\n    prose += min(stopfrac, 0.5) * 4.0                 # peaks ~ real prose (~0.4)\n    prose += -1.5 if stopfrac < 0.20 else 0.0         # hard penalty for keyword lists\n    prose += -1.0 if avg_line_words < 6 else 0.0      # hard penalty for menu dumps\n    scores[k] = imp + prose\n    if k % 20000 == 0:\n        print(f\"  {k}/{N}\")\n\n# Held-out LM perplexity rewards DIVERSITY, not extreme domain-matching:\n# ranking by raw target-likeness over-narrows the top-of-budget slice and\n# generalises worse than random. So: (1) GATE OUT the low-quality tail (junk,\n# boilerplate, keyword lists, non-prose), then (2) keep the surviving\n# high-quality pool in RANDOM order to preserve broad multi-domain coverage\n# within the token budget.\nnp.save(\"/tmp/scores.npy\", scores)\nnp.save(\"/tmp/ids.npy\", np.array(ids))\npassed = np.where(scores > -1e8)[0]\nKEEP_FRAC = 0.55                      # drop the worst ~45% by quality\nthr = np.quantile(scores[passed], 1 - KEEP_FRAC)\nkept = [i for i in passed if scores[i] >= thr]\nrng2 = np.random.default_rng(123)\nrng2.shuffle(kept)                    # diversity: random order within the HQ set\nkeep = [int(ids[i]) for i in kept]\nprint(f\"threshold {thr:.3f}  emitting {len(keep)} ids (of {len(passed)} passing length gate)\")\njson.dump(keep, open(OUT, \"w\"))\nprint(\"wrote\", OUT)\n", "structuredPatch": [{"oldStart": 118, "oldLines": 7, "newStart": 118, "newLines": 7, "lines": [" np.save(\"/tmp/scores.npy\", scores)", " np.save(\"/tmp/ids.npy\", np.array(ids))", " passed = np.where(scores > -1e8)[0]", "-KEEP_FRAC = 0.55                      # drop the worst ~45% by quality", "+KEEP_FRAC = 0.70                      # drop the worst ~30% by quality (tuned)", " thr = np.quantile(scores[passed], 1 - KEEP_FRAC)", " kept = [i for i in passed if scores[i] >= thr]", " rng2 = np.random.default_rng(123)"]}], "userModified": false, "replaceAll": false}

threshold 0.571  emitting 124215 ids (of 177451 passing length gate)
wrote /workspace/submission/selection.json
matches sel70: True n= 124215

[stdout]
threshold 0.571  emitting 124215 ids (of 177451 passing length gate)
wrote /workspace/submission/selection.json
matches sel70: True n= 124215
[metadata] {"noOutputExpected": false}

n 124215 unique True inrange True
approx chars in first 12k ids: 47613167 ~tokens 11903291

[stdout]
n 124215 unique True inrange True
approx chars in first 12k ids: 47613167 ~tokens 11903291
[metadata] {"noOutputExpected": false}

File created successfully at: /workspace/claim.md (file state is current in your context — no need to Read it back)

[metadata] {"type": "create", "filePath": "/workspace/claim.md", "content": "# Curation claim\n\n## Hypothesis\nFor a fixed small token budget (12M) and a **broad, multi-domain** HQ English\ntarget, the dominant lever is **removing the low-quality tail of the raw web pool\nwhile preserving broad diversity** — *not* maximizing similarity to the target\ndomain. Concretely: gate out the worst ~30% of documents by a prose/target-quality\nscore, then train on the survivors in **random (diversity-preserving) order**. This\nbeats both a random selection and an aggressively domain-matched selection.\n\n## Mechanism (prediction observable *other* than final perplexity)\nThe relationship between \"fraction of the pool kept\" and held-out perplexity is\n**non-monotonic with an interior optimum**, not a straight \"purer is better\" curve.\nTwo concrete, independently checkable predictions:\n\n1. **Aggressive top-k domain matching underperforms random.** Ranking documents by\n   raw target-likeness (mean per-word importance weight `log p_target − log p_pool`)\n   and taking the top-of-budget slice yields a model *worse* than a random baseline,\n   because the top slice collapses onto a narrow, homogeneous register.\n2. **A gentle junk-trim with an interior optimum.** Sweeping the keep-fraction, the\n   best held-out perplexity occurs at an intermediate fraction (~0.7), with both\n   heavier filtering (0.25–0.35) and near-no filtering (0.85) doing worse.\n\nBoth were observed on the dev target: raw top-k ≈ 549 ppl vs random ≈ 466; the\nkeep-fraction sweep gave 0.25→477, 0.35→480, 0.55→446, **0.70→404–441**, 0.85→443.\nThe mechanism is a diversity/quality trade-off: over-filtering removes register\ndiversity the LM needs to generalize; under-filtering leaves boilerplate that wastes\nbudget.\n\n## Falsification\nThe claim is falsified if, on the same frozen trainer, **either**: (a) the raw\ntop-k domain-matched selection matches or beats the random baseline, **or** (b) the\nkeep-fraction vs. perplexity curve is monotone (heavier filtering always helps, so\nthe smallest fraction wins). Either outcome would contradict the \"trim-the-tail,\nkeep-diversity\" mechanism and instead support naive \"more similar = better\".\n\n## Transfer\nThe criterion is target-domain-agnostic and should transfer to other broad HQ\ntargets and other budget sizes: estimate a cheap unigram importance weight from any\ndisclosed target sample + the pool background, add a domain-neutral prose-quality\ngate (function-word density, line-fragmentation, length), drop the worst ~30%, and\nkeep the rest in shuffled order. It requires no labels, no GPU for selection, and\nruns in one CPU pass over the pool.\n", "structuredPatch": [], "originalFile": null, "userModified": false}

-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2601 Aug  4 04:21 claim.md

submission/:
total 874
drwxr-xr-x 1 root root    180 Aug  4 04:18 .
drwxr-xr-x 1 root root    180 Aug  4 04:21 ..
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root   5291 Aug  4 04:18 curate.py
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 889326 Aug  4 04:20 selection.json
time left:
3206

[stdout]
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2601 Aug  4 04:21 claim.md

submission/:
total 874
drwxr-xr-x 1 root root    180 Aug  4 04:18 .
drwxr-xr-x 1 root root    180 Aug  4 04:21 ..
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root   5291 Aug  4 04:18 curate.py
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 889326 Aug  4 04:20 selection.json
time left:
3206
[metadata] {"noOutputExpected": false}