Skip to content
agent-swarm-optimization

gpt-5.6-sol

agent-swarm-optimization — graded by the task's verifier against a measured baseline.

backend
modal
variant
codex azure_ai/gpt-5.6-sol
metric
sealed AIME avg accuracy
actions
345
duration
2h 57m
recorded
2026-08-05

run idswarm-aime-optimization__R6Lb9Ae

Everything gpt-5.6-sol did on this task, in order.

download JSON ↗
codexgpt-5.6-sol368 turns23 narration345 reasoning345 action345 observation1 final
#126
reasoning (redacted)

encrypted chain-of-thought — recorded, not exposed

toolexec
args
{
  "input": "const r = await tools.exec_command({cmd:\"curl -s http://127.0.0.1:8000/metrics | rg '^vllm:num_requests_(running|waiting)|^vllm:generation_tokens_total'\\ncat /workspace/.timer/remaining_secs\",\"workdir\":\"/app\",\"yield_time_ms\":10000,\"max_output_tokens\":2000});\ntext(r.output);\n"
}
exec result
Script completed
Wall time 0.1 seconds
Output:
vllm:num_requests_running{engine="0",model_name="node-1b"} 20.0
vllm:num_requests_waiting{engine="0",model_name="node-1b"} 0.0
vllm:generation_tokens_total{engine="0",model_name="node-1b"} 1.618924e+06
5288
#127
narration

The replacement optimizer is now implemented and syntax-checked. It performs cost-aware successive halving across lean, parallel, cascade, and deeper heterogeneous graphs, calibrates against a strong one-shot gate, and then applies conservative leave-one-edge-out credit assignment. The currently running pass is evaluating the fast-decision parallel arm.

#128
reasoning (redacted)

encrypted chain-of-thought — recorded, not exposed

toolexec
args
{
  "input": "const r = await tools.write_stdin({session_id:69399,chars:\"\",yield_time_ms:30000,max_output_tokens:5000});\ntext(r.output);\n"
}
exec result
Script running with cell ID 71
Wall time 11.0 seconds
Output:
#129
reasoning (redacted)

encrypted chain-of-thought — recorded, not exposed

toolwait
args
{
  "cell_id": "71",
  "yield_time_ms": 10000,
  "max_tokens": 5000
}
wait result
Script completed
Wall time 8.9 seconds
Output:
#130
reasoning (redacted)

encrypted chain-of-thought — recorded, not exposed

toolexec
args
{
  "input": "const r = await tools.write_stdin({session_id:69399,chars:\"\",yield_time_ms:30000,max_output_tokens:5000});\ntext(r.output);\n"
}
exec result
Script running with cell ID 72
Wall time 11.0 seconds
Output:
#131
reasoning (redacted)

encrypted chain-of-thought — recorded, not exposed

toolwait
args
{
  "cell_id": "72",
  "yield_time_ms": 10000,
  "max_tokens": 5000
}
wait result
Script running with cell ID 72
Wall time 11.0 seconds
Output:
#132
reasoning (redacted)

encrypted chain-of-thought — recorded, not exposed

toolwait
args
{
  "cell_id": "72",
  "yield_time_ms": 10000,
  "max_tokens": 5000
}
wait result
Script completed
Wall time 0.0 seconds
Output:
#133
reasoning (redacted)

encrypted chain-of-thought — recorded, not exposed

toolexec
args
{
  "input": "const r = await tools.write_stdin({session_id:69399,chars:\"\",yield_time_ms:30000,max_output_tokens:5000});\ntext(r.output);\n"
}
exec result
Script running with cell ID 73
Wall time 11.0 seconds
Output:
#134
reasoning (redacted)

encrypted chain-of-thought — recorded, not exposed

toolwait
args
{
  "cell_id": "73",
  "yield_time_ms": 10000,
  "max_tokens": 5000
}
wait result
Script running with cell ID 73
Wall time 11.0 seconds
Output:
#135
reasoning (redacted)

encrypted chain-of-thought — recorded, not exposed

toolwait
args
{
  "cell_id": "73",
  "yield_time_ms": 10000,
  "max_tokens": 5000
}
wait result
Script completed
Wall time 0.0 seconds
Output:
#136
reasoning (redacted)

encrypted chain-of-thought — recorded, not exposed

toolexec
args
{
  "input": "const r = await tools.exec_command({cmd:\"curl -s http://127.0.0.1:8000/metrics | rg '^vllm:num_requests_(running|waiting)|^vllm:generation_tokens_total'\\ncat /workspace/.timer/remaining_secs\",\"workdir\":\"/app\",\"yield_time_ms\":10000,\"max_output_tokens\":2000});\ntext(r.output);\n"
}
exec result
Script completed
Wall time 0.1 seconds
Output:
vllm:num_requests_running{engine="0",model_name="node-1b"} 11.0
vllm:num_requests_waiting{engine="0",model_name="node-1b"} 0.0
vllm:generation_tokens_total{engine="0",model_name="node-1b"} 1.786444e+06
5138
#137
reasoning (redacted)

encrypted chain-of-thought — recorded, not exposed

toolexec
args
{
  "input": "const r = await tools.write_stdin({session_id:69399,chars:\"\",yield_time_ms:30000,max_output_tokens:5000});\ntext(r.output);\n"
}
exec result
Script running with cell ID 75
Wall time 11.0 seconds
Output:
#138
reasoning (redacted)

encrypted chain-of-thought — recorded, not exposed

toolwait
args
{
  "cell_id": "75",
  "yield_time_ms": 10000,
  "max_tokens": 5000
}
wait result
Script completed
Wall time 8.1 seconds
Output:
#139
reasoning (redacted)

encrypted chain-of-thought — recorded, not exposed

toolexec
args
{
  "input": "const r = await tools.write_stdin({session_id:69399,chars:\"\",yield_time_ms:30000,max_output_tokens:5000});\ntext(r.output);\n"
}
exec result
Script running with cell ID 76
Wall time 11.0 seconds
Output:
#140
reasoning (redacted)

encrypted chain-of-thought — recorded, not exposed

toolwait
args
{
  "cell_id": "76",
  "yield_time_ms": 10000,
  "max_tokens": 5000
}
wait result
Script completed
Wall time 10.0 seconds
Output:
#141
reasoning (redacted)

encrypted chain-of-thought — recorded, not exposed

toolexec
args
{
  "input": "const r = await tools.write_stdin({session_id:69399,chars:\"\",yield_time_ms:30000,max_output_tokens:5000});\ntext(r.output);\n"
}
exec result
Script running with cell ID 77
Wall time 11.0 seconds
Output:
#142
reasoning (redacted)

encrypted chain-of-thought — recorded, not exposed

toolwait
args
{
  "cell_id": "77",
  "yield_time_ms": 10000,
  "max_tokens": 5000
}
wait result
Script completed
Wall time 10.9 seconds
Output:
#143
reasoning (redacted)

encrypted chain-of-thought — recorded, not exposed

toolexec
args
{
  "input": "const r = await tools.write_stdin({session_id:69399,chars:\"\",yield_time_ms:30000,max_output_tokens:5000});\ntext(r.output);\n"
}
exec result
Script running with cell ID 78
Wall time 11.0 seconds
Output:
#144
reasoning (redacted)

encrypted chain-of-thought — recorded, not exposed

toolwait
args
{
  "cell_id": "78",
  "yield_time_ms": 10000,
  "max_tokens": 5000
}
wait result
Script completed
Wall time 8.1 seconds
Output:
#145
reasoning (redacted)

encrypted chain-of-thought — recorded, not exposed

toolexec
args
{
  "input": "const r = await tools.exec_command({cmd:\"curl -s http://127.0.0.1:8000/metrics | rg '^vllm:num_requests_(running|waiting)|^vllm:generation_tokens_total'\\ncat /workspace/.timer/remaining_secs\",\"workdir\":\"/app\",\"yield_time_ms\":10000,\"max_output_tokens\":2000});\ntext(r.output);\n"
}
exec result
Script completed
Wall time 0.1 seconds
Output:
vllm:num_requests_running{engine="0",model_name="node-1b"} 1.0
vllm:num_requests_waiting{engine="0",model_name="node-1b"} 0.0
vllm:generation_tokens_total{engine="0",model_name="node-1b"} 1.903886e+06
4968
#146
reasoning (redacted)

encrypted chain-of-thought — recorded, not exposed

toolexec
args
{
  "input": "const r = await tools.write_stdin({session_id:69399,chars:\"\",yield_time_ms:30000,max_output_tokens:5000});\ntext(r.output);\n"
}
exec result
Script running with cell ID 80
Wall time 11.0 seconds
Output:
#147
reasoning (redacted)

encrypted chain-of-thought — recorded, not exposed

toolwait
args
{
  "cell_id": "80",
  "yield_time_ms": 10000,
  "max_tokens": 5000
}
wait result
Script running with cell ID 80
Wall time 11.0 seconds
Output:
#148
reasoning (redacted)

encrypted chain-of-thought — recorded, not exposed

toolwait
args
{
  "cell_id": "80",
  "yield_time_ms": 10000,
  "max_tokens": 5000
}
wait result
Script completed
Wall time 0.0 seconds
Output:
#149
reasoning (redacted)

encrypted chain-of-thought — recorded, not exposed

toolexec
args
{
  "input": "const r = await tools.write_stdin({session_id:69399,chars:\"\",yield_time_ms:30000,max_output_tokens:5000});\ntext(r.output);\n"
}
exec result
Script completed
Wall time 0.0 seconds
Output:
{
 "accuracy_pct": 20.0,
 "n": 15,
 "correct": 3,
 "budget_violations": 0,
 "avg_calls": 4.0,
 "avg_completion_tokens": 44895.7
}
#150
narration

The non-thinking adjudicator failed badly (3/15), so candidate selection really does require mathematical adjudication, not a cheap majority relay. I’m reverting that arm and testing a more principled four-call cascade: two independent solvers → free code/audit → one deep referee → a non-thinking node that only formats the referee’s answer. The substantive referee remains the fourth reasoning stage.