gpt-5.6-sol
agent-swarm-optimization — graded by the task's verifier against a measured baseline.
- backend
- modal
- variant
- codex azure_ai/gpt-5.6-sol
- metric
- sealed AIME avg accuracy
- actions
- 345
- duration
- 2h 57m
- recorded
- 2026-08-05
run idswarm-aime-optimization__R6Lb9Ae
Everything gpt-5.6-sol did on this task, in order.
download JSON ↗encrypted chain-of-thought — recorded, not exposed
args
{
"cell_id": "94",
"yield_time_ms": 10000,
"max_tokens": 8000
}wait result
Script completed
Wall time 9.6 seconds
Output:
encrypted chain-of-thought — recorded, not exposed
args
{
"input": "const r = await tools.write_stdin({session_id:71623,chars:\"\",yield_time_ms:30000,max_output_tokens:8000});\ntext(r.output);\n"
}exec result
Script running with cell ID 95
Wall time 11.0 seconds
Output:
encrypted chain-of-thought — recorded, not exposed
args
{
"cell_id": "95",
"yield_time_ms": 10000,
"max_tokens": 8000
}wait result
Script running with cell ID 95
Wall time 11.0 seconds
Output:
encrypted chain-of-thought — recorded, not exposed
args
{
"cell_id": "95",
"yield_time_ms": 10000,
"max_tokens": 8000
}wait result
Script completed
Wall time 0.0 seconds
Output:
encrypted chain-of-thought — recorded, not exposed
args
{
"input": "const r = await tools.exec_command({cmd:\"curl -s http://127.0.0.1:8000/metrics | rg '^vllm:num_requests_(running|waiting)|^vllm:generation_tokens_total'\\ncat /workspace/.timer/remaining_secs\",\"workdir\":\"/app\",\"yield_time_ms\":10000,\"max_output_tokens\":2000});\ntext(r.output);\n"
}exec result
Script completed
Wall time 0.1 seconds
Output:
vllm:num_requests_running{engine="0",model_name="node-1b"} 5.0
vllm:num_requests_waiting{engine="0",model_name="node-1b"} 0.0
vllm:generation_tokens_total{engine="0",model_name="node-1b"} 2.406317e+06
4427
encrypted chain-of-thought — recorded, not exposed
args
{
"input": "const r = await tools.write_stdin({session_id:71623,chars:\"\",yield_time_ms:30000,max_output_tokens:8000});\ntext(r.output);\n"
}exec result
Script running with cell ID 97
Wall time 11.0 seconds
Output:
encrypted chain-of-thought — recorded, not exposed
args
{
"cell_id": "97",
"yield_time_ms": 10000,
"max_tokens": 8000
}wait result
Script running with cell ID 97
Wall time 11.0 seconds
Output:
encrypted chain-of-thought — recorded, not exposed
args
{
"cell_id": "97",
"yield_time_ms": 10000,
"max_tokens": 8000
}wait result
Script completed
Wall time 0.0 seconds
Output:
encrypted chain-of-thought — recorded, not exposed
args
{
"input": "const r = await tools.write_stdin({session_id:71623,chars:\"\",yield_time_ms:30000,max_output_tokens:8000});\ntext(r.output);\n"
}exec result
Script running with cell ID 98
Wall time 11.0 seconds
Output:
encrypted chain-of-thought — recorded, not exposed
args
{
"cell_id": "98",
"yield_time_ms": 10000,
"max_tokens": 8000
}wait result
Script completed
Wall time 0.0 seconds
Output:
I-1 pred 70 gold 70 OK calls 4 tok 10051
I-2 pred 588 gold 588 OK calls 4 tok 24699
I-3 pred 16 gold 16 OK calls 4 tok 19059
I-4 pred 117 gold 117 OK calls 4 tok 31376
I-5 pred 279 gold 279 OK calls 4 tok 29939
I-6 pred 504 gold 504 OK calls 4 tok 12928
I-7 pred 271 gold 821 X calls 4 tok 29858
I-8 pred 77 gold 77 OK calls 4 tok 25745
I-9 pred 62 gold 62 OK calls 4 tok 49393
I-10 pred 38 gold 81 X calls 4 tok 48346
I-11 pred 35 gold 259 X calls 4 tok 50442
I-12 pred 155 gold 510 X calls 4 tok 48014
I-13 pred 62 gold 204 X calls 4 tok 48013
I-14 pred 85 gold 60 X calls 4 tok 48327
I-15 pred 648 gold 735 X calls 4 tok 48014
SUMMARY 8 / 15 time 533.1
The four-call cascade also scored 8/15, but it did recover I-9 and reliably returned answers even when deep nodes exhausted their token budget. I’m now spending one extra call on the highest-value topology: three diverse solvers, free execution/audit, a deep referee, a free extraction node, and a tiny formatter. This isolates reasoning from output truncation while staying within 8 nodes and 15 edges.
encrypted chain-of-thought — recorded, not exposed
args
{
"input": "const r = await tools.exec_command({cmd:\"python3 - <<'PY'\\nimport sys,time,concurrent.futures\\nsys.path.insert(0,'/app/methods/main')\\nfrom swarm import Swarm,Node,BudgetMeter,load_problems\\nbase=Swarm.load('/app/methods/main/graph.json')\\nreview='''Act as the senior AIME referee. Re-solve the problem rigorously while auditing all proposed analyses and the executed result below. Inputs may be wrong. Find the first concrete error behind any disagreement; verify every condition, boundary case, multiplicity, and arithmetic step. After private reasoning, BEGIN the visible response with <answer>N</answer>, then give a compact decisive certificate without repeating exploration.\\\\n\\\\nProblem: {problem}{context}'''\\nrelay=\\\"/no_think\\\\nCopy the referee_extract node's reported candidate. Return ONLY that integer as <answer>N</answer>.\\\\n\\\\nProblem: {problem}{context}\\\"\\nnodes=base.nodes[:5]+[Node('referee',review),Node('referee_extract','', 'symbolic_verify'),Node('decision',relay)]\\nedges=[(-1,0),(-1,1),(-1,2),(2,3),(0,4),(1,4),(2,4),(3,4),(0,5),(1,5),(2,5),(3,5),(4,5),(5,6),(6,7)]\\nsw=Swarm(nodes,edges); sw.validate()\\nP=load_problems('/app/data/val.jsonl')\\nprint('nodes',len(nodes),'edges',len(sw.active_edges()),'llms',sum(nodes[i].kind=='llm' for i in sw._active_nodes()),flush=True)\\ndef one(ip):\\n i,p=ip; m=BudgetMeter()\\n try: pred=sw.run(p['problem'],m); err=''\\n except Exception as e: pred=None; err=type(e).__name__\\n return i,pred,m.calls,m.completion_tokens,err\\nstart=time.time()\\nwith concurrent.futures.ThreadPoolExecutor(max_workers=8) as ex:\\n rows=list(ex.map(one,enumerate(P)))\\nc=0\\nfor i,pred,calls,tok,err in rows:\\n ok=pred==int(P[i]['answer']); c+=ok\\n print(P[i]['id'],'pred',pred,'gold',P[i]['answer'],'OK' if ok else 'X','calls',calls,'tok',tok,err)\\nprint('SUMMARY',c,'/',len(P),'time',round(time.time()-start,1),flush=True)\\nPY\",\"workdir\":\"/app\",\"yield_time_ms\":1000,\"max_output_tokens\":8000,\"tty\":true});\ntext(r.output);\nif (r.session_id) text(`SESSION_ID=${r.session_id}`);\n"
}exec result
Script completed
Wall time 1.2 seconds
Output:
nodes 8 edges 15 llms 5
SESSION_ID=52492encrypted chain-of-thought — recorded, not exposed
args
{
"input": "const r = await tools.write_stdin({session_id:52492,chars:\"\",yield_time_ms:30000,max_output_tokens:8000});\ntext(r.output);\n"
}exec result
Script running with cell ID 100
Wall time 11.0 seconds
Output:
encrypted chain-of-thought — recorded, not exposed
args
{
"cell_id": "100",
"yield_time_ms": 10000,
"max_tokens": 8000
}wait result
Script running with cell ID 100
Wall time 11.0 seconds
Output:
encrypted chain-of-thought — recorded, not exposed
args
{
"cell_id": "100",
"yield_time_ms": 10000,
"max_tokens": 8000
}wait result
Script completed
Wall time 0.0 seconds
Output:
encrypted chain-of-thought — recorded, not exposed
args
{
"input": "const patch = \"*** Begin Patch\\n*** Update File: /app/methods/main/optimize.py\\n@@\\n-ANALYTIC = \\\"\\\"\\\"You are the primary expert AIME solver. Solve the problem independently and exactly. Identify the governing structure, derive the answer rigorously, handle all cases and constraints, and verify the result by substitution or a second calculation. Do not guess. After thinking, give a concise derivation and end with <answer>N</answer> for an integer N from 0 to 999.\\n+ANALYTIC = \\\"\\\"\\\"You are the primary expert AIME solver. Solve the problem independently and exactly. Identify the governing structure, handle all cases, and verify the result by substitution or a second calculation. Do not guess. After private reasoning, BEGIN the visible response with <answer>N</answer> for N in 0..999, then give a compact checkable derivation; do not repeat exploratory work.\\n@@\\n-SKEPTIC = \\\"\\\"\\\"Independently solve this AIME problem as a skeptical olympiad contestant. Seek a different representation or method from the obvious approach, explicitly check boundary cases, reversibility, counting multiplicities, and arithmetic. Trust no other proposed answer unless you can verify it. After thinking, give a compact checkable solution and end with <answer>N</answer>.\\n+SKEPTIC = \\\"\\\"\\\"Independently solve this AIME problem as a skeptical olympiad contestant. Seek a different representation or method from the obvious approach; check boundary cases, reversibility, multiplicities, and arithmetic. Trust no proposed answer unless verified. After private reasoning, BEGIN the visible response with <answer>N</answer>, then give a compact checkable certificate without repeating exploration.\\n@@\\n-COMPUTE = \\\"\\\"\\\"Solve this AIME problem using an exact computational or symbolic formulation whenever possible. Translate every condition faithfully; prefer exhaustive integer/rational computation to unsupported intuition. Verify the result mathematically. The LAST fenced Python code block in your entire response must be a self-contained standard-library program needing no input, terminating quickly, and printing only the integer answer; do not put any later code block after it. Also end the visible solution with <answer>N</answer>.\\n+COMPUTE = \\\"\\\"\\\"Solve this AIME problem using an exact computational or symbolic formulation whenever possible. Translate every condition faithfully; prefer exhaustive integer/rational computation to intuition and verify the model. After private reasoning, BEGIN the visible response with <answer>N</answer>, then a compact justification. The LAST fenced Python code block in the entire response must be a self-contained standard-library program needing no input, terminating quickly, and printing only N; put no code block after it.\\n@@\\n-REVIEW = \\\"\\\"\\\"Act as a rigorous AIME solution referee. Re-solve the problem while auditing the proposed analyses and executed result below. Locate the first concrete error in any disagreement, check all constraints and arithmetic, and produce one corrected compact solution. End with <answer>N</answer>.\\n+REVIEW = \\\"\\\"\\\"Act as the senior AIME referee. Re-solve the problem rigorously while auditing all proposed analyses and the executed result below. Inputs may be wrong. Find the first concrete error behind any disagreement; verify every condition, boundary case, multiplicity, and arithmetic step. After private reasoning, BEGIN the visible response with <answer>N</answer>, then give a compact decisive certificate without repeating exploration.\\n@@\\n FAST_DECIDE = \\\"\\\"\\\"/no_think\\n@@\\n Problem: {problem}{context}\\\"\\\"\\\"\\n+\\n+RELAY = \\\"\\\"\\\"/no_think\\n+Copy the referee_extract node's reported candidate. Return ONLY that integer as <answer>N</answer>.\\n+\\n+Problem: {problem}{context}\\\"\\\"\\\"\\n@@\\n def parallel_four() -> Swarm:\\n@@\\n- Node(\\\"decision\\\", FAST_DECIDE),\\n+ Node(\\\"decision\\\", DEEP_DECIDE),\\n@@\\n def cascade_four() -> Swarm:\\n@@\\n- Node(\\\"referee\\\", REVIEW),\\n- Node(\\\"decision\\\", FAST_DECIDE),\\n+ Node(\\\"referee\\\", REVIEW),\\n+ Node(\\\"referee_extract\\\", \\\"\\\", \\\"symbolic_verify\\\"),\\n+ Node(\\\"decision\\\", RELAY),\\n@@\\n- (0, 4), (1, 4), (2, 4), (3, 4),\\n- (0, 5), (1, 5), (2, 5), (3, 5), (4, 5)]\\n+ (0, 4), (1, 4), (2, 4), (3, 4),\\n+ (4, 5), (5, 6)]\\n@@\\n def deep_five() -> Swarm:\\n@@\\n- Node(\\\"referee\\\", REVIEW),\\n- Node(\\\"decision\\\", FAST_DECIDE),\\n+ Node(\\\"referee\\\", REVIEW),\\n+ Node(\\\"referee_extract\\\", \\\"\\\", \\\"symbolic_verify\\\"),\\n+ Node(\\\"decision\\\", RELAY),\\n@@\\n- (0, 5), (1, 5), (2, 5), (3, 5), (4, 5),\\n- (4, 6), (5, 6)]\\n+ (0, 5), (1, 5), (2, 5), (3, 5), (4, 5),\\n+ (5, 6), (6, 7)]\\n@@\\n- Node(\\\"decision\\\", FAST_DECIDE),\\n+ Node(\\\"decision\\\", DEEP_DECIDE),\\n*** End Patch\";\ntext(await tools.apply_patch(patch));\n"
}exec result
Script completed
Wall time 0.0 seconds
Output:
{}encrypted chain-of-thought — recorded, not exposed
args
{
"input": "const r = await tools.exec_command({cmd:\"python3 -m py_compile /app/methods/main/optimize.py\\npython3 - <<'PY'\\nimport sys\\nsys.path.insert(0,'/app/methods/main')\\nimport optimize\\nfor f in (optimize.parallel_four,optimize.cascade_four,optimize.deep_five,optimize.lean_three):\\n s=f(); s.validate(); print(f.__name__,len(s.nodes),len(s.active_edges()),optimize.active_llms(s))\\nPY\",\"workdir\":\"/app\",\"yield_time_ms\":10000,\"max_output_tokens\":3000});\ntext(r.output);\n"
}exec result
Script completed
Wall time 0.2 seconds
Output:
parallel_four 6 13 4
cascade_four 7 12 4
deep_five 8 15 5
lean_three 5 10 3
encrypted chain-of-thought — recorded, not exposed
args
{
"input": "const r = await tools.write_stdin({session_id:52492,chars:\"\",yield_time_ms:30000,max_output_tokens:8000});\ntext(r.output);\n"
}exec result
Script running with cell ID 103
Wall time 11.0 seconds
Output:
encrypted chain-of-thought — recorded, not exposed
args
{
"cell_id": "103",
"yield_time_ms": 10000,
"max_tokens": 8000
}wait result
Script running with cell ID 103
Wall time 11.0 seconds
Output:
encrypted chain-of-thought — recorded, not exposed
args
{
"cell_id": "103",
"yield_time_ms": 10000,
"max_tokens": 8000
}wait result
Script completed
Wall time 0.0 seconds
Output:
encrypted chain-of-thought — recorded, not exposed
args
{
"input": "const r = await tools.write_stdin({session_id:52492,chars:\"\",yield_time_ms:30000,max_output_tokens:8000});\ntext(r.output);\n"
}exec result
Script running with cell ID 104
Wall time 11.0 seconds
Output:
encrypted chain-of-thought — recorded, not exposed
args
{
"cell_id": "104",
"yield_time_ms": 10000,
"max_tokens": 8000
}wait result
Script running with cell ID 104
Wall time 11.0 seconds
Output:
encrypted chain-of-thought — recorded, not exposed
args
{
"cell_id": "104",
"yield_time_ms": 10000,
"max_tokens": 8000
}wait result
Script completed
Wall time 0.0 seconds
Output:
encrypted chain-of-thought — recorded, not exposed
args
{
"input": "const r = await tools.write_stdin({session_id:52492,chars:\"\",yield_time_ms:30000,max_output_tokens:8000});\ntext(r.output);\n"
}exec result
Script running with cell ID 105
Wall time 11.0 seconds
Output:
encrypted chain-of-thought — recorded, not exposed
args
{
"cell_id": "105",
"yield_time_ms": 10000,
"max_tokens": 8000
}wait result
Script completed
Wall time 7.6 seconds
Output: